After convincing the jury to give a Not Guilty verdict, Juror #8 walks over to #3, his nemesis, and puts his coat on for him. The gesture shows us that despite the extent to which they’ve argued in the jury room, there will be no hard feelings once they head back into the world.
How did the jurors vote in the end of 12 Angry Men?
Shocked by Juror 3’s outburst, the men decide to take another vote. The jury is split evenly with six jurors (Jurors 2, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11) voting “not guilty.”
What was the 12 Angry Men verdict?
The verdict of a seemingly open and shut case lies in the hands of twelve Jury members, the verdict is obvious, guilty.
Who was last juror to vote not guilty?
Juror 3 was the last to change his vote. His stubbornness to change his decision from guilty to not guilty appears early in the play.
Why did Juror 3 change his vote?
Why does Juror 3 change his vote to not guilty? Juror 3 changed his vote after realizing that all of his anger toward the defendant was a direct result of his bad relationship with his son. Due to his change of vote from guilty to not guilty, Juror 3 shows growth in character and is therefore considered dynamic.
Why did Juror 5 change his vote?
In Act II Juror 3 accused Juror 5 of changing his vote to not guilty after seeing his abrupt anger at Juror 10’s comments about how the slums are “… breeding grounds for criminals”. The other jurors do not seem to mind him very much.
How did Juror 8 convince other jurors?
Finally, Juror #8 helps convince some of the last holdouts by showing them that the other key witness was almost certainly not wearing her glasses when she allegedly saw the boy kill his father. For most of the jurors, this is the final nail in the coffin, and the verdict eventually turns to Not Guilty.
What was Juror #3 doing that made Juror #8 angry causing him to exclaim This isn’t a game?
What was Juror#3 doing that made Juror#8 angry, causing him to exclaim, “this isn’t a game!”? He was playing tic-tac-toe. What fact finally convinces the remaining jurors to vote “not guilty”? The fact that the eyewitness wore glasses and would not have had time to put them on to see the murder clearly.
Was the boy in 12 Angry Men innocent or guilty?
In the end, the teen is found not guilty, and the jurors go their separate ways; the thunderstorm that has been building throughout the film passes, the clouds break, the music swells, and we turn off the film content that justice was done.
Which juror grew up in the slums?
Juror Five is very young and unworldly and therefore intimidated by the other jurors, but wants to do a good job. Like the teenage defendant who is accused of murdering his father, he comes from the slums. He grew up with knife fights, poverty, and violence as a way of life.
Why did the last guy change his mind in 12 Angry Men?
Juror Four – One of the last men to be convinced that the boy is not guilty, he finally changes his mind after realizing that the woman who witnessed the crime likely didn’t have her glasses on.
Why is Juror 8 a hero?
By the end of the movie, Juror #8 has proven himself to be a true hero for standing by his principles and having the courage and skill to put them to work. He eventually gets the jury to find the defendant Not Guilty, and in the process, he avoids sending an innocent 18 year-old kid to jail.
What did Juror #2 bring up about the knife?
Juror #2 asks to see the knife again. He says that the stab wound in the dead man was a downward wound. But the father was 6’2 and the son was only 5’7, which means it would have been awkward for the kid to make a downward wound.
What happened between Juror 3 and his son?
Juror 3 has a son that he hasn’t spoken to in 3 years, so he is anxious to blame ‘rotten kids’ for all the problems that exist in the world. He was ashamed when his son was 8 and walked away from a fight, so he rode him hard to ‘make a man out of him. ‘ When his son was a teenager, he punched his father in the face.